Wuxi Royman supplier profile / DG500A / DG500B
Supplier-published product familyDG500 single-drum forklift grab family
A mechanical fork-mounted drum attachment, with single- and double-jaw variants grouped. Confirm the drum rim, fork interface and truck capacity together.
Identify the enquiry scope
- Table variants / jaw arrangement
- DG500A single jaw / DG500B double jaw
- Source attachment rating
- 500 kg in each table column
- Listed attachment net weights
- 52 / 60 kg respectively
- Listed overall dimensions
- 910 × 730 × 850 / 910 × 760 × 850 mm
Reviewed 22 October 2026. Dimensions and ratings are attributed to the supplier table, not independent testing; request current exact-model documents.
What the official product catalogue establishes
The DG500 entry is a mechanical attachment carried on forklift forks for handling one drum. It is not a standalone drum truck, lifting mast or rotator. The technical table identifies DG500A with a single jaw and DG500B with a double-jaw arrangement, both listed at 500 kg. The introductory sentence mistakenly repeats DG500A for both descriptions, and a paragraph refers to a double-drum design despite the single-drum heading and table. Those inconsistent sentences are not treated as evidence of another model or two-drum capability. The two table variants remain grouped on one reference page pending a current confirmation.
Define the work before choosing a configuration
Begin with the actual drum: material, diameter, height, loaded mass, rim profile and condition. A statement that the family can handle different drums does not prove compatibility with a specific steel or plastic drum. Ask for a drawing or documented matching basis for the proposed rim and lower support arrangement. The source’s claim about handling damaged drums is not adopted. This page provides purchasing questions, not instructions for engaging a clamp or moving a load. The current truck, attachment and drum combination needs an appropriate technical assessment before use.
Keep the supply package explicit
The attachment rating is separate from the forklift’s residual capacity. Obtain the attachment mass, horizontal centre-of-gravity position, load position and the truck manufacturer’s applicable capacity basis. The source table includes a 1,150 mm centre-distance figure and a 150 × 55 fork-interface cell; the row wording does not sufficiently establish every measurement point or orientation for the proposed installation. Ask for a dimensioned drawing before concluding that existing forks fit. The page mentions different retention arrangements; require the supplier to identify the included method and documentation. No chain, locking fitting or illustrated jaw establishes a safety approval, universal fit or present supply package.
Questions for the proposed product
Is the quote for DG500A or DG500B?
Request a current drawing that labels the jaw count, drum count, attachment weight and overall envelope. Have the supplier reconcile the duplicated A designation and double-drum paragraph against the technical table. Do not substitute DG360, DG1000 or another capacity code on the basis of similar appearance.
What evidence supports this drum and fork interface?
Provide drum and fork dimensions, rim photographs and the truck’s complete identification. Request the matching basis, pocket dimensions and measurement orientation, support geometry and retention package. A broad drum material description or a clean presentation image is insufficient to establish the physical match.
What remains separate from the attachment’s 500 kg figure?
Ask for the truck-specific residual-capacity assessment at the intended height and load position. Keep attachment rating, truck capacity, drum condition, documentation and commercial inclusions separate. Compare current drawings and supplier responses, and preserve unresolved points rather than presenting a family rating as approval of the complete handling system.
From product research to a comparable request
Prepare a written requirement with the load, load centre, handling height, support dimensions, site interfaces, operating conditions, destination and quantity. Ask each shortlisted supplier to answer the same requirement and identify assumptions or exclusions. Keep the proposed equipment or attachment, accessories, documentation, delivery and support scope visible as separate lines. An equivalent headline capacity does not by itself make two offers comparable.
Sources and evidence boundary
The source is Wuxi Royman’s own sales catalogue. The supplier entry is dated 12 August 2015. This historical catalogue date is not evidence of a current offer or new release; the review date is not a release date. The company describes development and manufacture on its own website; inclusion is not an independent factory audit or proof of brand authorization. It establishes published product-family presentation, not local stock, a confirmed delivery date, a specific quotation, export coverage or a technical approval. Manufacturer benefits and safety, performance, emissions, certification and savings claims have not been independently verified here. Request current exact-model documentation and appropriate technical review for the actual transaction. This is selection and procurement research, not operating or repair guidance.
http://www.royman.cn/43/131.html
http://www.royman.cn/about/Introduction/
http://www.royman.cn/cont/contact/