Robot Phoenix Shaoxing supplier profile / Camel-2000 / Camel-3000

Supplier catalogue product reference

Robot Phoenix Camel-2000 / 3000 heavy lifting robots

Two heavy lifting models in one reference, with electric 100 mm and hydraulic 130 mm lift kept separate.

Independent presentation prepared from the official product imagery. It explains the product form, not exact dimensions, internal construction, current stock or the item supplied.

Identify the enquiry scope

Corresponding rated loads
Camel-2000: 2000 kg; Camel-3000: 3000 kg
Different lift systems
2000: electric / 100 mm; 3000: hydraulic / 130 mm
Corresponding battery entries
67 Ah / 48 V; 135 Ah / 48 V
Open source discrepancy
Camel-3000 mass: summary 900 kg / parameter row 900 mm

Reviewed 28 October 2026. Source dating: Official company catalogue, six detail bodies with parameter panels and mapped originals reviewed 28 October 2026. Technical release date and actual build revision unverified.. Catalogue family and model examples retained; illustration is representative, not an exact model.

What the official reference establishes

The official catalogue publishes Camel-2000 and Camel-3000 as heavy lifting robots, with respective rated-load entries of 2000 and 3000 kg. Camel-2000 lists a 1900 × 1200 × 400 mm envelope and 1640 × 940 mm support panel; Camel-3000 lists 2000 × 1300 × 420 mm and 1740 × 1040 mm. These entries describe different designs. A higher payload does not make the smaller panel or envelope transferable to the larger model, and the table does not establish the permitted load centre or fixture.

Keep the reference and interfaces together

Camel-2000 lists electric lifting with 100 mm stroke and a 67 Ah / 48 V lithium iron phosphate battery. Camel-3000 lists hydraulic lifting with 130 mm stroke and 135 Ah / 48 V. Both list dual steered-wheel drive and laser SLAM or QR navigation; the actual selected package and integration remain to be agreed. Their 40 mm clearance entries do not independently approve a floor or route. The illustration follows the Camel-3000 original and represents this family, not every detail of Camel-2000.

Keep the supply package explicit

Keep two source inconsistencies visible: Camel-3000 has “900 kg” in its summary but “900 mm” in the mass row of its parameter panel; Camel-2000 acceleration is printed with different units in the summary and table. Do not silently repair those entries or treat either as verified operating data. Ask for a dated technical sheet, panel/interface drawing, load distribution and current vehicle mass, together with the exact battery, charger, software, navigation and sensor scope. Runtime, positioning and protective-function statements remain supplier claims requiring agreed project acceptance.

Questions for the proposed product

What should the requirement contain?

Record goods dimensions, gross mass and centre of gravity, load support and fixture drawings, pickup and drop-off heights, complete loaded envelope, floor and route conditions, duty, charging opportunities and destination. A payload row is not an approved carrier, trolley, fixture or site design.

Which integration documents are needed?

Ask for the exact build revision, carrier and interface drawings, load limits, battery and charger schedule, navigation choice, host-system protocol and included software. Define acceptance tests, responsibility for site assessment and integration, exceptional conditions and support scope with the responsible supplier. This page gives no commissioning or recovery procedure.

How should offers be compared?

Confirm the legal quoting and invoicing entity, actual configuration, included sensors, software, chargers, services, delivery, warranty and exclusions. The corporate catalogue and published subsidiary address do not establish Shaoxing stock, local manufacture or an approved installation. Existing purchasing paths prepare a request; a click is not an enquiry.

From product research to a comparable request

Prepare a written requirement with the duty or installed component identity, current drawings or part records, quantity, destination and requested supply scope. Compare the exact proposed configuration or component and keep unresolved differences visible. Existing supplier and purchasing tools remain below; following a link does not itself send an enquiry.

Sources and evidence boundary

The current Robot Phoenix company website publishes its Shaoxing subsidiary address in Shangyu, Zhejiang. These references are drawn from the corporate material-handling catalogue, not a local stock list. Six full product bodies, their parameter panels and mapped original images were reviewed. Closely related capacities are grouped while lifting systems, battery rows and source inconsistencies remain distinct. Separate legal identity, current quoting entity, configuration, inventory and site acceptance require written confirmation. Illustrations explain external form and are not stock photographs, dimensional drawings or approved sensor layouts.

https://www.robotphoenix.com/productsdetail/104.html

https://www.robotphoenix.com/productsdetail/105.html

https://omo-oss-image.thefastimg.com/portal-saas/pg2024091219045426428/cms/image/c1b8b8e7-b57c-4fef-b38f-a710afbc6150.png

https://omo-oss-image.thefastimg.com/portal-saas/pg2024091219045426428/cms/image/40bd4fb3-a80d-4996-bded-41da167095e4.png

https://www.robotphoenix.com/products/7.html

Compare the other supplier references

Source-based industrial product illustration of supplier-listed Camel-2000 / Camel-3000